Angelic Mothers, Babies and Birth.

This message says nothing.

Personally, ive heard it said - repeatedly - that angelics were null when it comes ot sexuality and reproductive capabilities. me however, i say, why not?

Two people very close to me, both that claim to spiritually be with child and both are angels. One is also fallen. The nonfallen says this is her second child. To be honest I believe both of them. The fathers of at least two of the three children in question were older (claiming to be in existence of the first fall.) Them, I'm a little more shaky on my trust. So in short, I'm taking the opposite stance of RKCoon's opening statement. (In no way do I mean that as an attack on you RKCoon, I respect your opinions.)

Edit: After reading Terro's post (note: listed after this one), that it may appear I think angels are confined to two genders and the roles thought of as those genders. I don't; nothings ever that simple. That's just how it worked in those cases.

I do believe that Angels are capable of procreation. Many Angels are without gender, but I do believe that I was very male, and that others were male as well as still others who were female. Having gender thusly would support the ability to procreate. I believe it is rare, but possible.

I believe that it's been said on these boards that gender is between your ears. So yeah, angels can be one or the other. The actual act of procreation for beings of light/order(forgot which one) is a little fuzzy for me, though.

I am an offspring of an Angel. I have an angelic mother. Looking back I think I did find it hard to believe though I always had this sense and notion. My memories started flooding back before the time was right I think. I used to be mad in reserach on this topic. I did find so revelation to such of angels giving birth oddly and I knew this was me. Yet when asked I was kind of given the run around untill the moment was right and I was ready to hear the truth in all.

I don't see why there can't be Angel-babies. I'm with RKcoon and Misha tia on this one <!-- s --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_e_smile.gif" alt=":)" title="Smile" /><!-- s -->

Terro Wrote:Having gender thusly would support the ability to procreate.

As evidenced by the user info of many people on this board, gender doesn't really indicate much of anything in regards to actual procreation. Your'e thinking of sex.

Xanthus Wrote:

Terro Wrote:Having gender thusly would support the ability to procreate.

As evidenced by the user info of many people on this board, gender doesn't really indicate much of anything in regards to actual procreation. Your'e thinking of sex.

Biological sex, however, only matters in a physical reality. What was really necessary to procreate in the "spiritual" realm of Heaven were polarised energies, which, in our human understanding, translates into different genders.

Nic Wrote:

Xanthus Wrote:

Terro Wrote:Having gender thusly would support the ability to procreate.

As evidenced by the user info of many people on this board, gender doesn't really indicate much of anything in regards to actual procreation. Your'e thinking of sex.

Biological sex, however, only matters in a physical reality. What was really necessary to procreate in the "spiritual" realm of Heaven were polarised energies, which, in our human understanding, translates into different genders.

I was just pointing out a difference in the words, not anything mechanical about it. First off, I'm not going to assume that there is not some physical reality to heaven and angels, nor am I going to assume there isn't. Perhaps there is a physical portion there...but angel are unisex, so all that really matters IS gender? I certainly don't know.

But generally speaking, in terms of procreation, sex is more important than gender.